Women Want to be Owned
Women’s mating choices are a male-driven affair.
Editorial note: this is a guest post from The Pillars of Wisdom by
, the manosphere’s ultimate red pill bible and one of my favorite new books. Grab your copy immediately to turbo charge your toxic masculinityWomen’s mating choices are a male-driven affair.
Hypergamy is a central tenet of both Evolutionary Psychology and the manosphere. Women will discard or ignore lower-value men in favor of higher-status men. As Jordan Benzo Peterson puts it, women tend to marry “up or across” the social status hierarchy. But there is an essential problem with hypergamy. It’s not that it’s sexist – rather, it’s not sexist enough.
The manosphere also claims that women are hypo-agentic. Women are passive and innocent, while men make all the important decisions. This contradicts hypergamy. Women can’t have total control over a relationship and simultaneously have absolutely no control at the same time.
Take a look at history. Women marrying up was a contract between a prospective husband and father. The father attempted to negotiate a social benefit for his family in exchange for his daughter’s hand in marriage. Women marrying up was the result of human capital exchanged for social capital.
The transference of ownership of a woman from father to husband was hypergamy. Yet it had nothing to do with her preferences since she had no say. In our prehistory, seventeen women reproduced for every man that reproduced. Do you think that these men were “preselected” by these women? Or did these men dominate their rivals and claim all the women themselves? Which scenario makes more sense to you?
A minority of powerful men have always selected the best women for procreating. These women desired to become the property of these men. They benefited from the resources and protection of those powerful men.
We can corroborate this by seeing how male and female courting behavior mirrors that of many mammals. The males of horned animals – such as rams and bulls compete for dominance by butting their heads, locking horns with each other. A close human parallel are dominance displays seen in evening social venues such as clubs. Guys square off against each other – chests out, shoulders spread and butting foreheads. Are these intimidation tactics and posturing done to attract women? Or are they targeted at prospective challengers and ownership of space?
Male courting involves dominance displays to establish ultimate authority over a specific territory. Female courting involves making herself as attractive as possible. Men intimidate rivals. Women compete with other women to be selected by the winners of these dominance displays.
Women notice a man’s sovereignty and attempt to attract his attention, so that he will take ownership of her.
The war bride is the product of this exact process. First men violently win dominance displays. Then they appropriate the women previously owned by their rivals, and impregnate them. This is the state of nature for Man. Any framework of sexual dynamics using evolution as its foundation should start here.
Hypergamy is based on the mistaken belief that women select, rather than let themselves be selected. When women settle for Beta Bucks, it’s because an Alpha hasn’t taken ownership of her yet. She will always be ready for Alpha Fucks to replace him.
To understand ownership, we must now confront the issue of rape, and further analyze it from a psychoanalytic standpoint. We’ve all seen the rape fantasy statistics, and the orgasm-during-rape statistics. We’ve also seen the utter obsession with rape that women reveal in their “romance” novels. But how do we make sense of this and the seemingly contradictory rape-hysteria as well as regret-rape? First of all, let’s understand what rape actually is, since it doesn’t exist in nature. Female consent exists only within a “social context”. Being the weaker sex, women need the protection of men to fight off unwanted advances. Nowhere is this more clear than in modern society. If you rape a woman, it’s not her that punishes you, but rather the state’s enforcers: other men. Taking this fact to its logical conclusion means that rape only exists in so far as a woman is somehow attached to a man that can punish you for the rape. The rape is then not a transgression against the woman. It is against the man that the woman has some sort of relationship to. He is the one who administers punishment.
What we call rape is thus a man appropriating a woman, taking ownership of her. This is only a crime in so far as the woman is already beholden to someone. Rape is a crime today because the state has de-facto ownership of all women under its jurisdiction. It merely lends them to men, under a terms-of-license-agreement. The latter is of course broken whenever a woman decides it’s broken (we call that no-fault divorce and believe women [when they claim sexual assault]). This is why marital rape (an anti-concept) exists. Modern marriage is not a man taking ownership of a woman, it’s the state lending the woman to him as long as he behaves.
Fucking the shit out of a woman is only part of the process of claiming ownership of a woman. To completely own her means to totalize her psyche. In other words, to break the social conditioning imposed on her by the state. The process is simple - fuck her brains out, then re-condition her. You become the center of her universe by keeping her close and treating her as the first mate of the ship that is your life, of which you are the captain. This is why women change personalities according to their boyfriends. It is the gradual totalization of her psyche by the specific cock that is at a certain point in time regularly rearranging her insides.
To truly fuck a woman’s brains out and to truly establish your own conditioning is at the very least skirting the boundaries of legality. This process must be gradual and subtle. If you attempt to claim her before breaking the state’s hold on her, she will likely get you in trouble.
Regret-rape is nothing but the hypothetical rationalization hamster. People retroactively rewrite their history and experience based on how they feel in the present moment. A woman can retroactively decide that her sexual experience with you was non-consensual. This is the retroactivity of meaning. Understanding our intentions requires putting them into words after the fact. Doing so requires filtering our experience through the worldview of society. This changes them to an extent.
One point that the hamster misses is the question of who is the girl rationalizing herself to. Is it herself, or is it the model of her “tribe at the moment”, watching her and evaluating her behavior? Rationalization to oneself is rationalization to the tribe aka the big Other. What this means is that regret rape is the consequence of not fucking her good enough to rearrange her psyche and totalize her. You fail to be her big Other, instead forcing her to excuse her behavior to her existing tribe. By contrast, a successful “rape” will break her tribe’s hold over her psyche. She will rationalize the experience as a night of passionate sex, one that she desired from the bottom of her heart all along.
Women want to be owned. They want your cock to totalize their psyche and give stability to their existence. Alpha widows are women that were detached from the existing tribal order by an Alpha Cock, but were then discarded by that same alpha. Hence they can’t develop a firm attachment until a bigger Alpha breaks the hold and re-totalizes her. Modern feminists are women who haven’t been fucked hard enough. They spout hysteric propaganda talking points because male feminists can’t fuck them hard enough to break the State’s hold on them.
The penis totalizes the female psyche in the same way that the master signifier totalizes an ideological field. A subpar penis is equivalent to no penis. Plurality of penises is equivalent to no penis. Stability for women is only guaranteed through one consistent penis.
The only way to have a healthy relationship with women is to OWN them. Physical ownership is impossible, especially in the modern West. You can’t get war brides. But you can be the subject presumed to fuck. Totalize their psyche by fucking their brains out.
If you are tired of aimlessly wandering around you need to move forward as a man with a clear action plan. Rather than doom scrolling through social media and jerking off to motivational quotes from Jordan Peterpuffer and friends, you need to understand the underlying concepts that structure the world.
You need The Pillars of Wisdom asap.
Thanks for tuning in to The Dream Lounge.
I hope you enjoyed this chapter from GLO’s new book.
/s/ Anthony Dream Johnson
 | A guest post by
|
You mean to tell me that if I fuck my girlfriend’s brains out she will be loyal to me instead of the feminist matriarchy? That’s low key awesome way to beat the current matriarchy.